[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xen-devel] Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/3] virtio infrastructure
- To: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:17:40 +1000
- Cc: Jimi Xenidis <jimix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Mailing List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "jmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kvm-devel <kvm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Borntraeger <cborntra@xxxxxxxxxx>, Suzanne McIntosh <skranjac@xxxxxxxxxx>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 05:16:11 -0700
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 02:25:32PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> OT: Does that hold for bonded interfaces too?
Yes. By default traffic to the same destination MAC always stick to
one interface. You could select a layer3+4 hashing policy but even
that guarantees a single flow will stick to one physical interface
unless it contains IP fragments which should never happen for TCP.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
