[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] running {MS/free}-DOS under XEN
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tomas Kovacik [mailto:Tomas.Kovacik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 11 May 2007 10:03 > To: Petersson, Mats; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] running {MS/free}-DOS under XEN > > Hi Mats. > here is output from my xm info: > [root@aero xen]# xm info > host : aero > release : 2.6.20-1.2316.fc5xen > version : #1 SMP Fri Apr 27 19:36:52 EDT 2007 > machine : x86_64 > nr_cpus : 8 > nr_nodes : 1 > sockets_per_node : 2 > cores_per_socket : 2 > threads_per_core : 2 > cpu_mhz : 2992 > hw_caps : > bfebfbff:20100800:00000000:00000180:0000e4bd:00000000:00000001 > total_memory : 3070 > free_memory : 272 > xen_major : 3 > xen_minor : 0 > xen_extra : .3-0-1.2316.fc5 > xen_caps : xen-3.0-x86_64 hvm-3.0-x86_32 > hvm-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_64 > xen_pagesize : 4096 > platform_params : virt_start=0xffff800000000000 > xen_changeset : unavailable > cc_compiler : gcc version 4.1.1 20070105 (Red Hat 4.1.1-51) > cc_compile_by : brewbuilder > cc_compile_domain : build.redhat.com > cc_compile_date : Fri Apr 27 18:52:28 EDT 2007 > xend_config_format : 2 > > do you know how could I install newer version of XEN, as you > mentioned xen-3.1-testing, in fedora core I use? i tried yum > install xen but it does not give me any newer version. do you > know where could i find i.e. repositories for yum(which would > be more confortable) or sources or package i could use? Ehm, no I don't know of any FC compatible archive for the latest 3.1 version. There is a 3.0.4 version available, built as an RPM for FC5, which should be a noticable improvement on your 3.0.1 version: http://www.xensource.com/download/index_3.0.4.html > as you can see, i use Intel processors, which might be the > problem as you mentioned... > the thing is, i need DOS to run pharlab under it. i used qemu > before. I run DOS successfully, but than when i was trying to > run pharlab, it died with some other problem i cannot find > even mentioned on internet, as pharlab is not usual software > to use(it is kind of telecommunication switching centre > running on proprietary HW up on DOS) PharLap is a "DOS-Extender", which means that it does use tricks involving real-to-potected mode excursions. I don't know if it assumes that segment registers will remain in place after those excursions - if that's the case, then you'd have problems using it on Intel at the moment, I think. There are several improvements in 3.1 that will make this "more likely to work", but I wouldn't hold my breath. For a version after 3.1, there will be a modified way of running real-mode on Intel processors, and that will almost certainly achieve better compatibility with real hardware. -- Mats > any idea? > THANKS. TOMAS > > Petersson, Mats wrote: > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of > Tomas Kovacik > Sent: 10 May 2007 10:00 > To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [Xen-devel] running {MS/free}-DOS under XEN > > Hi there. > I was looking around for a log time but I did > not find any > user who would be able to run MS-DOS or freeDOS > under Xen. I > use vmlinuz-2.6.20-1.2316.fc5xen kernel and > when I try to > boot MS-DOS 7.1 it freezes with message shown > in attachement > 1. Also freeDOS freezes with message as in attachement2. > I tried to install these two systems from the > same iso image > under qemu and it went OK so it seems that XEN > there is some > issue with XEN and DOS running together. > > > > Which version of Xen is this ("xm info" will give you > version numbers), > and is it an AMD or Intel processor you're using? > > I have recently (and succcessfully) run MS-DOS 6.22c on > an AMD-V capable > processor with xen-unstable, changeset circa 14800. I > expect this will > work on the latest xen-3.1-testing version as well. > Whether it works on > older versions, I'll let you figure out. > > On Intel processors, there is a potential problemm in that these > processors don't support native real-mode in > virtualized mode. This > means that the guest has to trick around with > "vm86-mode", which causes > problems particularly with dos-extenders that switch > from real mode to > protected mode and back again [the real problem here is > maintaining the > extended segment values that may have been set during > the excursion to > protected mode - if there is no segment values > "expected to survive" the > transition, it should work just fine to switch between > modes on Intel > processors too]. > > -- > Mats > > > > > could somebody help me to run some version od > DOS under XEN? > thank you very much. > TOMAS KOVACIK > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |