[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xen-devel] Re: [patch 09/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: remove HAVE_ARCH_MM_LIFETIME, define no-op architecture implementations
- To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:48:40 -0800
- Cc: Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:47:57 -0800
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
James Bottomley wrote:
> Yes ... I forgot about that ... we'd need an asm/mmu_context_paravirt.h
> on every arch.
>
Yep. And I'm not too keen on that name; one could imagine other uses
for those hooks, even if they're being used for x86 paravirtualization
in this instance.
> I suppose this is just me being lazy ... I'm currently doing a bit of a
> rewrite in asm-parisc/mmu_context.h and I didn't want a massive merge
> conflict.
>
Well, I'm happy to create asm-generic/mm_hooks.h or something, and
reduce all the changes to asm-*/mmu_context.h to a one-liner.
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
