[Xen-devel] Re: [patch 00/21] Xen-paravirt: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface

[Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Zachary Amsden wrote:

> For the most part, it doesn't disturb VMware or KVM.  Xen does need some
> additional functionality in paravirt-ops because they took a different design
> choice - direct page tables instead of shadow page tables.  This is where all
> the requirements for the new Xen paravirt-ops hooks come from.

It still seems to be implemented for Xen and not to support a variety of 
page table methods in paravirt ops.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel