Re: [Xen-devel] new -xen.c files in sparse tree

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Empty files can certainly be removed. Where there's any diff at all, it's a
matter of taste whether we have separate files or ifdef XEN.

 -- Keir

On 8/2/07 10:22, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> What is the purpose of adding arch/i386/kernel/alternative-xen.c, when the
> delta to native is a single line?
> 
> Even more funny - arch/i386/kernel/intel_cacheinfo-xen.c doesn't show any
> difference to native...
> 
> Shouldn't we try to reduce the number of such files, to ease maintaining them?
> 
> Jan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel