[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6] PM extension to domU
> So this is the point about definition about driver domains. If we > consider driver domain as the part of I/O virtualization service > provider like dom0, minios-style is perfectly right and quick. > However we have to consider the cases where user just wants > device passthrough for performance. Actually most requirements > on the list before driver domain was back to xen3.0, are all related > to a full guest which doesn't provide backend service to others. > > Then actually we have two scenarios: > - Minios-driver domains created automatically to balance I/O > virtualization, as part of increasing overall xen performance > - Full guest with direct device assignment just for performance, > which is created by user manually Kevin, Keir, Are Mini-OS based driver domains possible today? Is there a group working on this? Thanks, Aravindh _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |