Re: [Xen-devel] Modular Xen

[Daniel Stodden <stodden@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 19:30 +0200, David Pilger wrote:
> It seems to me that Xen is full of stuff that aren't beneficial for
> everybody, this includes NUMA, ACM and other stuff that certain
> companies try to introduce... 

can anyone explain to me what the current numa-bashing is all about?
i'm running a lot of my stuff on 4-way opteron servers, these system are
far from uncommon these days and certainly beyond a mere 'introduction
attempt'.

are there any numbers regarding the code size/performance penalty on
systems limited to a single memory node? i'd really be interested.

regards,
daniel

-- 
Daniel Stodden
LRR     -      Lehrstuhl fÃr Rechnertechnik und Rechnerorganisation
Institut fÃr Informatik der TU MÃnchen             D-85748 Garching
http://www.lrr.in.tum.de/~stodden         mailto:stodden@xxxxxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: F5A4 1575 4C56 E26A 0B33  3D80 457E 82AE B0D8 735B

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel