[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Re: compat BUG
Applied. Cheers, Emmanuel. On Jan 10, 2007, at 16:44, Jan Beulich wrote: Just got this one, see attached log ...Below patch should fix it - need to take multicall context into consideration whendetermining the continuation arguments for mmuext ops. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> Index: 2007-01-08/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c ===================================================================--- 2007-01-08.orig/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c 2006-12-15 15:32:58.000000000 +0100 +++ 2007-01-08/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c 2007-01-10 16:06:16.000000000 +0100@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT #include <xen/event.h> +#include <xen/multicall.h> #include <compat/memory.h> #include <compat/xen.h> @@ -289,20 +290,27 @@ int compat_mmuext_op(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(mm if ( err == __HYPERVISOR_mmuext_op ) { struct cpu_user_regs *regs = guest_cpu_user_regs(); - unsigned int left = regs->ecx & ~MMU_UPDATE_PREEMPTED; + struct mc_state *mcs = &this_cpu(mc_state);+ unsigned int arg1 = !test_bit(_MCSF_in_multicall, &mcs->flags)+ ? regs->ecx + : mcs->call.args[1]; + unsigned int left = arg1 & ~MMU_UPDATE_PREEMPTED; - BUG_ON(!(regs->ecx & MMU_UPDATE_PREEMPTED)); + BUG_ON(left == arg1); BUG_ON(left > count); guest_handle_add_offset(nat_ops, count - left); BUG_ON(left + i < count);guest_handle_add_offset(cmp_uops, (signed int)(count - left - i));left = 1;BUG_ON(!hypercall_xlat_continuation(&left, 0x01, nat_ops, cmp_uops));- BUG_ON(left != regs->ecx); - regs->ecx += count - i; + BUG_ON(left != arg1); + if (!test_bit(_MCSF_in_multicall, &mcs->flags)) + regs->_ecx += count - i; + else + mcs->compat_call.args[1] += count - i; } else - BUG_ON(rc > 0); + BUG_ON(err > 0); rc = err; } _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |