[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux/i386: allow CONFIG_HIGHPTE on i386

To: "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:39:04 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:37:20 -0800
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

>And I said that sync'ing with i386 is a good general rule. I trust the code
>a lot more. :-)

I certainly agree to this in general. And I can certainly re-do the patch 
syncing
the other way around...

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux/i386: allow CONFIG_HIGHPTE on i386
  - From: Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux/i386: allow CONFIG_HIGHPTE on i386
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] Fix the slow wall clock time issue in x64 SMP Vista
Next by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] [Patch] Fix the slow wall clock time issue in x64 SMP Vista
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux/i386: allow CONFIG_HIGHPTE on i386
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux/x86-64: sync page table allocation with i386 (was: Re: [PATCH] linux/i386: allow CONFIG_HIGHPTE on i386)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.