[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] yet another package check (take 2)
On 15/12/06 09:33, "Ewan Mellor" <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> As I can't think of a smarter way, I think taking this change will depend on >> whether it's acceptable to the majority to require all install prerequisites >> to >> be present on build-only machines, > > That's certainly not acceptable. We won't have the bridge-utils on our build > boxes, for instance. Perhaps we should have different behaviour between 'make install' and 'make dist' in this respect? The latter shouldn't run install checks, certainly, but arguably the former should. Anyhow, I'll back out the changes to the Makefile for 3.0.4 (which means in -unstable, for now) and we can revisit this argument for 3.0.5. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |