[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] machine check support in HVM guests
> -----Original Message----- > From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Jan Beulich > Sent: 27 November 2006 12:30 > To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [Xen-devel] machine check support in HVM guests > > Neither SVM nor VMX suppress CPUID[1].EDX.MC{E,A}, but there > also is no > virtualization of the respective MSRs. Since the latter seems > to have at best > marginal usefulness, shouldn't CPUID be respectively updated? I think masking those bits would be usefuller than implementing "machine check virtualization", so "Yes". -- Mats > > Thanks, Jan > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |