[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?
On 14/11/06 12:32, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Oh, good point! Okay then the more straightforward XENVER_version check will >> have to be used: 3.0.3 and newer, versus 3.0.2 and older. > > More strait forward? The .3 is part of extraversion, so in order to do a > comparison > one would have to parse that string (and hence make certain assumptions). > That's > not nice for use in (early) feature detection. Maybe it'd be better to try and > write > a page table entry without PAGE_USER, and check whether that bit got turned > on implicitly... Yes, that sounds reasonable. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |