[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] is_initial_xendomain()
Ian Pratt wrote: >> #ifdef CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST >> #define is_initial_xendomain() (xen_start_info->flags & > SIF_INITDOMAIN) >> #else >> #define is_initial_xendomain() 0 >> #endif >> >> If that is acceptable, I'm ready to create a respective patch >> (but I'd like to avoid spending time on it if there are objections). > > Personally, I'd like to see CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST disappear > altogether. The code size saving is small, and most people use the -xen > kernel rather than -xen0/-xenU anyway. For development it's handy to have a separate xenU kernel, for both build time and size. Most size savings come from dropping all the drivers though, not CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST. And gcc should be clever enougth to optimize away "if (0) { code block }", so you get the size savings even with CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST being hidden in some header file as listed above. cheers, Gerd -- Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx> http://www.suse.de/~kraxel/julika-dora.jpeg _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |