[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] binary or instead of logical in timer sync
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: [...] > The only reason for using binary operators in those predicates is to > avoid extra branches in the generated code which would probably be > generated to follow the short-circuiting semantics of the logical > operators. In fact, I think a smart optimising compiler would generate > the *same* object code regardless of whether we use binary/logical or > (but I don't believe gcc is that smart yet!). Manual optimizations like use of bitwise rather than logical operations may speed up the program (depending on how dumb or confused the optimizer is), but they certainly slow down the poor maintenance programmer. Bit-wise where I expect logical makes me hesistate and check, because it's an unusual pattern, and in my experience often wrong. As with all optimizations that uglify the code, use it only when you *know* it actually optimizes something worth optimizing. Knowing requires measuring. Okay, I'll step off my soapbox now. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |