[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] Question Also regarding interrupt balancing
- To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: harish <mvharish@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 09:58:39 -0700
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 09:59:01 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ZtHnzZ5xsmCFIoXu0aobSQCthnj6dpTwcKpdGUxG0Fe6+0tl8aEhddXm9A9iw4mygnPIHRFrsLrtBOjJoXJO0nJv5+DfYTYCoKPalrJdV6E2dWD/qJKr0zNoDgBdM06zQKm8w/ods7e0dwRHdI33LDAdXJixyJ+BN0x99patS8I=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Hi Keir,
echo "2" > /proc/irq/23/smp_affinity does not seem to change the value in smp_affinity
cat /proc/irq/23/smp_affinity still shows 0f
Could there some bug or configuration problem that you can think of?
thanks
hmv
On 6/10/06, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9 Jun 2006, at 19:39, harish wrote:
> Is it possible to use smp_afffinity to pin the interrupts to specific
> pcpus.
>
> In my machine:
>
> cat /proc/irq/23/smp_affinity
> 0f
>
> I tried
> echo "2" > /proc/irq/23/smp_affinity [with the hope that the
> interrupts get routed to pcpu1]
>
> But do not see the new value taking effect. I am missing something.
> thanks in advance,
That should definitely work and have an effect on /proc/interrupts.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
