[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] [RESEND] Question about recursive mappings
> About the possible fix, won't something like trying a > get_linear_pagetable() at all level works? Will it cause too > much overhead? > Generally speaking, is allowing a R/O mapping of another > table the domain own (whichever level it is) safe? At first > thought, i don't see any way of exploiting it. Yes, it's safe, you just need to get the 'general' ref count right, which as I recall, depends on whether the page you're mapping is in the same page table, or a foreign page table. The va back pointer means that there is a unique 'normal' place in each pagetable where a given page can be mapped, so you can easily inspect (via xen's linear mapping) to see whether the page belongs to the current pagetable or not. One thing we do have to watch out for is when we introduce super page mappings, as you have to be careful about using linear page tables in this context -- the x86 pagetable format doesn't allow you to generate a trap if a linear mapping attempts to misuse a superpage. That's not your worry right now :-) Ian _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |