[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make "xm mem-set" be lowerboundondomX-min-mem
Kier, The floor was chosen because we found the system to be unreliable below that value (in the tests we did on sles 10). A floor I think is useful to have even if the value picked is a different one. K. Y >>> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:34 pm, in message <3fff45e9026898258afc2445c25d85c9@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 22 May 2006, at 17:31, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh wrote: > >> Will this patch be acceptable if the floor is removed and >> xen_start_info- >nr_pages is used instead of max_pfn? > > The 192000 floor is just a bit bizarre. I wouldn't be sorry to lose > that. But max_pfn is the right thing to use, not - >nr_pages, I think. > > -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |