[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] xenoprof fixes: active_domains races
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 16 May 2006, at 10:47, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >> Is it okay to include the conversion to mutex in xen-specific code? > > Any semaphores that were added by the xenoprofile patches should be > changed to mutexes. The rest should be left alone. Done. Patch for the rest just went to lkml. >> There's machinery to go from sparse tree + patches to full tree (make >> prep-kernels). Is there a way to propagate changes from full tree >> pack to sparse tree + patches, where hg diff takes care of creating >> patchfiles? > > Not as far as I know. I touch them infrequently enough that when I do > I simply re-create the patches manually. > > If you want, provide a single patch in the same form as your two > previous ones then I'll turn it into patch-of-a-patch format and check > it in. On its way. Thanks! _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |