[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix for Failed VMEntry on VMX
Okay - revised patch attached. Thanks, Dave Keir Fraser wrote: On 2 May 2006, at 15:58, David Lively wrote:I've been getting a "Failed VMEntry" when trying to boot a second VMX guest (while the first one is still running, but is no longer in real mode). This patch fixes it.Please `or' the vmread/vmwrite error returns together into an error variable and BUG_ON(error) just once at the bottom of the function. Also extend the comment a little to explicitly explain that this is working around a VMENTRY validation check.Apart from that it looks good. -- Keir Ensure segment bases are consistent with their selectors for VMX guests in VM86 mode. Signed-off-by: David Lively <dlively@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> diff -r 880433ba7487 xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c Mon May 1 17:08:02 2006 -0400 +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c Tue May 2 12:43:47 2006 -0400 @@ -487,6 +487,44 @@ static void vmx_store_cpu_guest_regs( __vmptrld(virt_to_maddr(current->arch.hvm_vmx.vmcs)); } +/* The VMX spec (section 4.3.1.2, Checks on Guest Segment + * Registers) says that virtual-8086 mode guests' segment + * base-address fields in the VMCS must be equal to their + * corresponding segment selector field shifted right by + * four bits upon vmentry. + * + * This function (called only for VM86-mode guests) fixes + * the bases to be consistent with the selectors in regs + * if they're not already. Without this, we can fail the + * vmentry check mentioned above. + */ +static void fixup_vm86_seg_bases(struct cpu_user_regs *regs) +{ + int err = 0; + unsigned long base; + + err |= __vmread(GUEST_ES_BASE, &base); + if (regs->es << 4 != base) + err |= __vmwrite(GUEST_ES_BASE, regs->es << 4); + err |= __vmread(GUEST_CS_BASE, &base); + if (regs->cs << 4 != base) + err |= __vmwrite(GUEST_CS_BASE, regs->cs << 4); + err |= __vmread(GUEST_SS_BASE, &base); + if (regs->ss << 4 != base) + err |= __vmwrite(GUEST_SS_BASE, regs->ss << 4); + err |= __vmread(GUEST_DS_BASE, &base); + if (regs->ds << 4 != base) + err |= __vmwrite(GUEST_DS_BASE, regs->ds << 4); + err |= __vmread(GUEST_FS_BASE, &base); + if (regs->fs << 4 != base) + err |= __vmwrite(GUEST_FS_BASE, regs->fs << 4); + err |= __vmread(GUEST_GS_BASE, &base); + if (regs->gs << 4 != base) + err |= __vmwrite(GUEST_GS_BASE, regs->gs << 4); + + BUG_ON(err); +} + void vmx_load_cpu_guest_regs(struct vcpu *v, struct cpu_user_regs *regs) { if ( v != current ) @@ -523,6 +561,8 @@ void vmx_load_cpu_guest_regs(struct vcpu __vm_set_bit(EXCEPTION_BITMAP, EXCEPTION_BITMAP_DB); else __vm_clear_bit(EXCEPTION_BITMAP, EXCEPTION_BITMAP_DB); + if (regs->rflags & EF_VM) + fixup_vm86_seg_bases(regs); __vmwrite(GUEST_CS_SELECTOR, regs->cs); __vmwrite(GUEST_RIP, regs->rip); @@ -540,6 +580,8 @@ void vmx_load_cpu_guest_regs(struct vcpu __vm_set_bit(EXCEPTION_BITMAP, EXCEPTION_BITMAP_DB); else __vm_clear_bit(EXCEPTION_BITMAP, EXCEPTION_BITMAP_DB); + if (regs->eflags & EF_VM) + fixup_vm86_seg_bases(regs); __vmwrite(GUEST_CS_SELECTOR, regs->cs); __vmwrite(GUEST_RIP, regs->eip); _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |