Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Check some returns of common functions

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 26 Apr 2006, at 20:02, Aron Griffis wrote:

> > The following might be clearer than doing the workaround in-place
> > though:
> >
> > #define ignore_retval(x) do { long __r; __r = (long)(x); } while (0)
> How is a custom wrapper clearer than (void), which is generally
> recognized as intentionally ignoring the return value?
Good point, except that casting the result to void does not avoid the 
warning/error in this particular case so we have to pick a less 
attractive workaround.
 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel