[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] (XEN) HVM_PIT:missed ticks < 0

To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ed Smith" <esmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:35:20 +0800
Cc: xen-devel Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:36:10 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Thread-index: AcZm22ucMF3Jal+2QnyiXwoV+SoZuQAlfy2A
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] (XEN) HVM_PIT:missed ticks < 0

> guests, but if those messages are coming out that early for you then
> it looks like maybe the patch will only hide the underlying problem.
> 
Yes, we have collected bunch of SMP time virtualization issue and the
design is ongoing now.

Eddie

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Prev by Date: Re: Hypercall number assignment convension (was Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH]: kexec: framework and i386)
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] output from DOM0_PHYSICAL_MEMORY_MAP ordered?
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] (XEN) HVM_PIT:missed ticks < 0
Next by thread: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH]: kexec: framework and i386
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.