[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH]: kexec: framework and i386
Hi, Mark Thank you for your comments! >I think kdump, in general, is a nifty solution for supporting crashdumps, >since using a separate kernel for crashdumps gives you the best possible >opportunity to complete them successfully. > >Integrating with the Linux crashdump infrastructure seems like a good idea. >It doesn't stop other dom0 OSes using their own crashdump infrastructure, >but >with kdump we have a chance of getting a dump even if Xen itself crashes >(whilst admittedly rare, such crashes are something you'd want to get >debugged quickly!) > Yes, I also agree. >So, essentially, I think the idea is good - I'll try and take a look through >the code. > I also try to read a new patch. http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2006-04/msg00968.html Can kexec hypecll use Hypercall 11 or 30? I think using not hypercall but dom0_op is good idea because using kexec is rare. :-) Best Regards, Akio Takebe _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |