Re: [Xen-devel] Compiling xenoprof

[David Carr <dc@xxxxxxxxx>]

Renato,

Thanks for your reply.  The steps below got the kernels to build.  I'm
not sure that everything is quite right yet though.  I can profile on
domain 0 and also run opcontrol --reset on the guests.  However running
"opcontrol --start" on the guests results in:

Using default event: GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS:100000:1:1:1
Failed to open profile device: Operation not permitted
Using 2.6+ OProfile kernel interface.

Couldn't start oprofiled.
Check the log file "/var/lib/oprofile/oprofiled.log" and kernel syslog

It appears that this error is coming daemon/liblegacy/init.c or
daemon/init.c
This error only occurs on the guests (which are using the dom0 kernel). 
opcontrol --start suceeds on dom0.

Any ideas?

Thanks again,
David Carr

Install steps:

In Xen 3.0.0 source directory:

patch -p1 < xenoprof-2.0-xen-3.0.0.patch
patch -p1 < xenoprof-2.0-linux-2.6-sparse.patch
make kernels

This will ultimately fail. Then do:

In linux-2.6.12-xen0 directory:

patch -p2 < xenoprof-2.0-linux-2.6.12.patch
make kernels

This will ultimately fail. Then do:

In linux-2.6.12-xenU directory:

patch -p2 < xenoprof-2.0-linux-2.6.12.patch
make kernels

This will succeed. Then do:

make dist
sudo make install


In oprofile source directory:

patch -p1 < oprofile-0.9.1-xen.patch


Install oprofile normally


Santos, Jose Renato G wrote:

> 
>David,
>
>You are right. This is not very clean.
>Yes, you need to do a "make" to create the xen0 and xenU trees
>before applying the patch in step c).
>If you configure the kernel with oprofile support (CONFIG_OPROFILE)
>before step c) you will probably get a compilation error when 
>you run make since the patch was not applied yet. You could either delay
>setting (CONFIG_OPROFILE) for after you apply patch "c" or you
>can apply the patch after you get the compilation error, and then
>run make again.
>
>It would be better if there was a "make" option to create the
>xen0/xenU trees without compiling them. Does anybody know if 
>there is such an option? I remember looking for it in the Makefile
>and not finding it, but this was a while ago.
>
>We are now working on getting the xenoprof code included in
>xen-unstable.
>This should make life much easier for those wanting to use oprofile.
>
>Renato   
>
>  
>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>>[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
>>>David Carr
>>>Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:31 PM
>>>To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>Subject: [Xen-devel] Compiling xenoprof
>>>
>>>I'm having some trouble compiling Xen 3.0.0 with the 
>>>xenoprof patches.
>>>
>>>The xenoprof instructions say:
>>>
>>>  In order to run OProfile in Xen environments four patches 
>>>are needed:
>>>  a) xenoprof-2.0-xen-3.0.0.patch
>>>     Patch for Xen hypervisor.
>>>  b) xenoprof-2.0-linux-2.6-sparse.patch
>>>     Patch for Xenolinux. Contains oprofile architecture 
>>>specific driver 
>>>     for xen (Apply to linux-sparse tree in Xen source tree)
>>>  c) xenoprof-2.0-linux-2.6.12.patch
>>>     Patch for oprofile kernel module in linux 2.6.12. 
>>>Contain modifications
>>>     to generic oprofile driver code to support xen. (Apply 
>>>twice, once to 
>>>     dom0 and once to domU trees)
>>> 
>>>
>>>Every thing goes fine until part c.  The linux-2.6.12-xen0 
>>>and linux-2.6.12-xenU directories are empty until you build 
>>>xen (and therefore can't be patched yet.)  Doing a make 
>>>world will populate these trees but also compiles everything.
>>>
>>>What is the proper sequence of patching and make commands to 
>>>build a xenoprof tree?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>David Carr
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Xen-devel mailing list
>>>Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>
>>>      
>>>


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel