[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] VMI for Xen?
* Ian Pratt (m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > Just some food for thought, I did a simple analysis of the > > size of Xen Linux patches verses the VMI patches. To make > > things more fair, I removed everything from the XenoLinux > > port accept for the i386 xen subarch (so no drivers and no > > support for other architectures). > > Your analysis is still taking all the patches to make dom0 functionality > work, which accounts for a lot of changes and is totally outside of the > scope of VMI. > > We've been working with a bunch of RH/Novell folks to create a stripped > down domU-only Xen patch that would be a fairer comparison. Here's a really imprecise view into that. Keeping with Anthony's metrics: 88 files changed, 7637 insertions(+), 436 deletions(-) That's near meaningless, as it's not something that would compile and run, but gives you a scope of the size of the changes for domU only (shadow mode), no Xen drivers, etc.. thanks, -chris _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |