[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Bootloader configuration
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 03:15:07PM +0000, John Levon wrote: > Are you referring to a grub Xen port, or the "boot something once to get > images" thing that's been discussed, or something else? A grub port (or similar) seems like the most useful thing. The less dom0 has to understand about domU's kernel/fs peculiarities, and the less fs, config and loader code that needs to be rewritten just for Xen, the better. I think the xm config runes defining a domain should only need to be changed for something that would be a hardware upgrade in non-virtual hosting. Any purely software changes within the domain (including change of os/fs) shouldn't require intervention by a dom0 administrator. Tim. -- Tim Deegan (My opinions, not the University's) Systems Research Group University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |