[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] X86_64 "assert" when booting 64-bit image.
Keir Fraser wrote: > On 9 Feb 2006, at 17:44, Nakajima, Jun wrote: > >> I think that particular check is valid; it's basically saying "we >> shadow page tables only". I feel mfn_is_page_table can be wrong with >> the type PGT_fl1_shadow, which is bigger than PGT_l4_shadow. Let me >> check and come back. I slightly remember I needed to kill the check >> when I was debugging the code, but not sure if it was triggered by a >> bug. > > Yeah, you killed the check by calling ___shadow_status() directly in > one place, but there's also a path via sync_all which still was bad. > > I just killed the whole function and renamed ___shadow_status() to > take its place. > > -- Keir Sounds sensible. That check was overkill for the non-debug Xen. I checked if we can remove the whole section, and it worked fine (i.e. 64-bit hvm guest on the 64-bit Xen). Jun --- Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |