[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] connecting dom0 directly to the bridge(was:performance problems...)
> > On Thu, Jan 12 '06 at 12:24, Ian Pratt wrote: > > > You haven't connected dom0 directly to the bridge rather > > than vif0.0 > > > to the bridge have you? > > I've been doing that with xen 2.0 and xen 3.0.0, what's bad > > about doing this? > > You shouldn't connect directly if you run services in dom0 for the > domU's. Using vif0.0 prevents a possible deadlock. > I must be missing something here... doesn't the init script itself add eth0 to xen-br0??? Does dom0 somehow internally create vif0.0 as a mirror of eth0? You said 'You haven't connected dom0 directly to the bridge rather than vif0.0 to the bridge have you?'... I took that to mean 'You haven't connected eth0 in dom0 directly to the bridge rather than vif0.0 to the bridge have you?'... was that the right interpretation? My DomU is a mail server, so it needs to connect to the external network, not just Dom0. Thanks James _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |