[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] ioemu patch from Ewan Mellor (was: VMXstatusreport Nov. 2)
Ian Pratt <> wrote: >> Can we go back to the beginning, please? Do you actually _want_ any >> vifs? Surely with VMX domains you are not using vifs at all? > > There was an attempt to unify the configuration file syntax so that > the same syntax for vifs and vbds would also apply to emulated > devices. I know this was achieved with vbd's, I'm guess it was with > vif's too. [This is where the 'ioemu:' prefix in the target specifier > (2n'd > parameter) in a vbd config comes from, allowing a vmx domain to have > both emulated and paravirtulaized disks/partitions.] Yes, that's story of ioemu.Currently, vif has no ioemu prefix yet. The error shall caused by not setting nics=0. It is not related with vmx. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |