Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Updated XenMon Patch

[Diwaker Gupta <diwaker.lists@xxxxxxxxx>]

> I didn't mean to imply that XenMon is deficient in any way.  Only that it is
> a different kind of performance tool than, say, a function-level tool like
> Xenoprof.  XenMon works well for me now, the only suggestion I have is to
> improve the formatting of the notlive output:  some numbers are printed with
> 12 significant figures and the columns are not well-aligned.

And I didn't think you did! :-) Its really good to see someone
actually using the tool, and so I was just interested in getting some
more feedback from you. Like Rob said, we didn't really pay much
attention to notlive output. Those 12 digits are a Python thing --
numbers are rarely that precise. We'll try to improve it. Thanks
again!

I think XenMon and XenoProf are complementary, and useful for
different kinds of analysis. Neither is a panacea for profiling by
itself.

Diwaker
--
Web/Blog/Gallery: http://floatingsun.net

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel