[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Stale comment about GDT indexes in arch-x86_32.h ?

To: "Joakim Dahlstedt" <jda@xxxxxxx>
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:12:46 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:04:59 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>


On 17 Oct 2005, at 12:28, Joakim Dahlstedt wrote:

And the comment just does not make any sense to me. 1c00 or e000 had
made sense. Is this just a stale comment for an earlier version of Xen
that just should be updated or am I missing something fundamental?


Yes, the comments are stale.

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] Stale comment about GDT indexes in arch-x86_32.h ?
  - From: Joakim Dahlstedt

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] domU crash
Next by Date: AW: [Xen-devel] domU crash
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] Stale comment about GDT indexes in arch-x86_32.h ?
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] PAE on xen-2.0 testing?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.