[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface -- p2m tables
On Monday 03 October 2005 17:03, Ian Pratt wrote: > > So if your choice then is between a compatibility translation > > layer and altering the interface, I think it's pretty clear > > that changing the interface will result in the least amount > > of additional code (and associated long-term code maintenance). > > This would result in doubling the size of the all the p2m and m2p > tables, I don't believe this is true. The tools can create those tables as arrays of 32- or 64-bit mfns depending on the bitsize of the domain being created. Xen would also know the bitsize of the domain, and so could treat the tables as 32- or 64-bit as needed. That of course only matters if people actually do the work to run 32-bit domains on 64-bit hypervisor. Fixing the ABI enables that work, should people want to pursue it later. -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |