[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Benchmarking Xen (results and questions)
David_Wolinsky@xxxxxxxx wrote: Did you run each JBB test config several times to ensure consistent results? What JVM is this?Hi all, Here are some benchmarks that I've done using Xen.However, before I get started, let me explain some of configuration details…Xen Version SPECjbb WebBench Linux Distribution Debian 3.1 HT disabled Linux Kernel 2.6.12.2 Host Patch CK3s Here are the initial benchmarks SPECJBB WebBench 1 Thread 1 Client 2 Clients 4 Clients 8 Clients BOPS TPS TPS TPS TPS Host 32403.5 213.45 416.86 814.62 1523.78 1 VM 32057 205.4 380.91 569.24 733.8 2 VM 24909.25 NA 399.29 695.1 896.04 4 VM 17815.75 NA NA 742.78 950.63 8 VM 10216.25 NA NA NA 1002.81(and some more notes…. BOPS - business operations per second, TPS - transactions per second…SPECjbb tests CPU and Memory WebBench (the way we configured it) tests Network I/O and Disk I/O Values = AVG * VM count Domain configurations 1 VM - 1660 MB - SPECJBB 1500MB 2 VM - 1280 MB - SPECJBB - 1024MB 4 VM - 640 MB - SPECJBB - 512 MB 8 VM - 320 MB - SPECJBB - 256 MBSeeing how the SPECjbb numbers declined so bizarrely, I did some scheduling tests and found this out…Test1: Examine Xen's scheduling to determine if context switching is causing the overheadPeriod Slice BOPs Modified 8 VM 1 ms 125 us 6858 8 VM 10 ms 1.25 ms 14287 8 VM 100 ms 12.5 ms 18912 8 VM 1 Sec .125 Sec 20695 8 VM 2 Sec .25 Sec 21072 8 VM 10 Sec 1.25 Sec 21797 8 VM 100 Sec 12.5 Sec 11402 Would it be possible to format these more appropriately for email? I am having a little trouble reading this :) Thanks, -Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |