[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen repository
On 5/23/05, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sat, 21 May 2005, Ian Pratt wrote: > > > We're currently investigating alternatives to BK for the > > public repos > > > and should have an alternative up and running in a couple of weeks. > > > > Git? > > > > I am not sure I can recommend Arch any more after my > > experience with it as the linuxbios repo. > > That's useful information, thanks. > > cogito (the renamed git) looks pretty 'raw' at the moment. I did of > playing around with mercurial last night and was impressed with how much > functionality it has in just 2k lines of python. > > One option is to just have a public CVS repo, and then everyone can use > whatever SCM tool they prefer as pretty much everything has an 'import > from CVS' feature. The only dowsnide to this is CVS's inability to > represent the current branch structure. > how about using subversion instead of CVS? one drawback of using Mercurial is that it is not that stable. as far as i know, nobody is using it now (?). so it is pretty risky to use Mercurial as a long term solution for Xen. regards, aq _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |