Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86-64-phys-ma.patch

[Christian Limpach <christian.limpach@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 5/12/05, Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Christian Limpach wrote:
> > On 5/12/05, Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>phys is machine physical already. So we shouldn't try to convert guest 
> >>physical to machine physical.
> >
> >
> > Are you sure that the test a few lines further down shouldn't use (a
> > to be defined -- see i386) pte_val_ma to compare the currently
> > installed pte with the to-be-installed one?  You might be comparing
> > random values otherwise...
> >
> 
> Sounds reasonable. I tested that this incremental patch doesn't cause
> any new regressions.

Thanks -- checked in.

     christian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel