Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] explicitly defining memmove for x86_64

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Without the attached patch ubuntu's gcc (3.3.5) was complaining about
> the implicit declaration of __builtin_memmove. Extern'ing past that,
> the linker wouldn't resolve the same symbol.
> 
> This patch just does the same thing that is already done for x86_32.
> 
> signed-off-by: scott parish <srparish@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> sRp

Thanks. I checked in a version that always uses the implementation in
arch/x86/string.c. It's not worthwhile inlining since it's never used
anywhere performance critical (should probably remove the version in
x86_32/string.h as well).

 -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel