[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] glibc patch for TLS?
Am Montag, den 25.04.2005, 21:57 +0100 schrieb Ian Pratt: > > > Nope, that's what I forgot. I recompiled the patched glibc > > with that flag and everything seems to be working fine. I > > can post the ebuild if people are interested. It's pretty > > straightforward, just adding the patch and making for the > > CFLAGS get set properly. > > > > I'm now compiling all my packages with > > -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs. Is this necessary/recommended? I > > know some ebuild strip out CFLAGS it's unsure of, so if it's > > necessary other packages may need to be modified. Now it's really cool to run a source distro like gentoo. I wonder if you can bootstrap it with that CFLAGS? > Glibc really hammers the thread local storage stuff and hence > experiences rather more of a slow down rather than any applications > we've come across, but it would obviously be preferable to recompile > anything that uses tls. > > One of the hard things is figuring out which applications actually make > use of the thread local attribute, and hence would actually benefit from > recompiling. > > I guess we could modify the warning message to print out the name of the > process that did the -ve segment access... Would be really helpful for all others running binary distros (like me). I have to identify the individual FC-rpms to rebuild them. So i vote for it. As FC4test shippes with Xen: how did they solve the probem (did they)? /nils. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |