RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxen-3.0 (libxc rewrite)

["Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > Do you have a suggestion for an alternative?  I know there 
> are a number 
> > of binding-generators but I thought Pyrex was the most widely used.
> 
> Pyrex is probably the most generally used -- the stuff pygtk uses is
> nice, but not very general.
> 
> In most cases, though, bindings done by hand end up being 
> higher quality
> than something that's just being generated.

I've just looked at Pyrex and it doesn't look like a good soloution to
me. It doesn't seem to offer much over the current manual bindings in
Xc.

Has anyone any recent experience with SWIG?

Ian


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: 2005 Windows Mobile Application Contest
Submit applications for Windows Mobile(tm)-based Pocket PCs or Smartphones
for the chance to win $25,000 and application distribution. Enter today at
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idh82&alloc_id148&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel