[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] x2d2
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 10:12 +0000, Andrew Warfield wrote: > We are in the process of some fairly major revisions to the control > tools. I think that the general expectation is that 3.0 will show > some pretty big changes to the control interfaces and tools. The > unstable tree now has a control switch (xcs) which sits under xend and > allows other applications to be written to use the control channels > without needing to modify xend. We are hoping to move towards small, > single-purpose management tools in dom0. > > This should all start to appear in the unstable tree over the next > couple of months. > > a. > Do you have plans you can share regarding these revisions to the control tools? I am exploring needs within my organization for management tools on Xen. Besides being interested in what you have planned, I can contribute assistance - development, testing, etc. Thanks. Michael > On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 01:58:46 -0800, Jacob Gorm Hansen <jacobg@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > Jacob Gorm Hansen wrote: > > > > > >> hi, > > >> > > >> is x2d2 (the minimal xend replacement in C if I understand correctly) > > >> still alive? I do not have bk at the moment, but grepping on x2d2 in > > >> the Changelog file only has a comment back from November. I can make > > >> it compile by removing -Werror from the Makefile, but is anyone using > > >> it and working on it, or is it a dead end? > > > > > > > > > I don't think so. It shouldn't actually work anymore. It doesn't do > > > proper notifications on event channels. There's also a bug in the way > > > ports are allocated. > > > > > > Is there still interest in x2d2 (or any C-based minimal xend)? I think > > > I could fix x2d2 pretty easily. > > > > > > > Yes, lots of interest from me, the python xend effectively keeps me from > > running Xen 2.0, so I am still stuck with 1.3. The stock xend uses too > > much memory, provides too much functionality, and depends on too many > > third-party packages -- not the ideal specs for the minimal trusted > > computing base I am trying to develop :-( > > > > Jacob > > > -- Michael Hohnbaum 503 578 5486 hohnbaum@xxxxxxxxxx t/l 775 5486 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |