[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] Re: nfsroot and brige
> Keir Fraser wrote: > > Well, leaving in the etherbridge patch is easier than removing > > it. I'll leave it for the time being. > > Um, what is the etherbridge patch actually? I missed the references to > it. 2.4 needs the bridge-nf to be able to use netfilter (iptables) in the presence of a bridge. > But, I'd just like to make sure - this aversion to bridging is because > of bridges getting configured wrong, people having wrong assumptions > on how they work, and bridges being a bad default choice, right? There > aren't any known actual bugs in Xen or bridge code wrt. bridging > setups, are there? Briding works fine if configured correctly. Ian > The reason is that we are/will be using bridging really extensively, > possibly soon with Xen virtual machines, although the configuration of > the bridges is going to be totally custom. > > -- Naked > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues > Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. > It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel > ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |