[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] xen-stable vs. xen-testing
So given the recent announcement of the linux local-privilege-escalation I want to upgrade my Xen box/VM to the latest kernel. I see that the xen-2.0 tree still has 2.6.9 and xen-testing has 2.6.10 patches. So I have a few questions: a) how stable is "testing" really?b) can I just build new kernels from the -testing tree or should I build the Xen VMM as well? c) do any of the Xen folks track BUGTRAQ or anything to keep up on potential kernel-level bugs that should be addressed relatively quickly? Granted, I don't think I've seen a legitimate linux kernel exploit in like four or five years now, but should another one pop up and I do track security lists would it be worth my effort to relay the info to the xen-list? d) I realize that Xen is really still R&D for the most part, but how do the Xen team feel about security issues like this? ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |