[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] xen 2.0(.1) stability
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Ian Pratt wrote: > > > So far, we are extremely happy with the stability of 2.0. Congrats. > > That's good to hear. > > Do you still use NFS root? Do you use 2.4 or 2.6 kernels? Yup. Pure nfsroot. pxegrub, nfsroot dom0, nfsroot domU. The only change, is that for 1.0/1.2, we used dhcp on the domU nodes. For 2.0, we use static routing. > > Well, it took us a long time to actually deploy a working 2.0 server. The > > default method of using a bridge broke the all nfs-root setup we had(our cpu > > nodes are diskless; makes them easier to maintain). > > I want to get example scripts for a routed (as opposed to bridged > setup) checked into the tree... I'm not fully satified with the scripts; that abuse parameters for their own nefarious purposes. Maybe when we convert the second machine to 2.0(it's 1.2 atm). ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |