Re: [Xen-devel] Kernel 2.6.10, reiser4, kernel 2.4.27 cpu load, and mailing list reply-to

["Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Christian Limpach wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 06:06:39PM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>  
>
> > 1.   Is there a way to compile kernel 2.6.10 or 2.6.9-mm1 with xen 2.0?
> > I tried both (with mkbuildtree from linux-2.6.9-xen-sparse), and both 
> > failed (on different places).
> > My primary goal is to use reiser4 on both xen-0 and xen-U kernel, so I'm 
> > more
> > interested in -mm kernel.
> >    
> The Linux sparse tree in xen-2.0-testing.bk and xen-unstable.bk has
> been updated to 2.6.10.  The -mm tree should include support for arch/xen,
> and should work on xen-2.0 and xen-2.0-testing.
>
>  
Which -mm? 2.6.9-mm1 don't have arch/Xen; 2.6.10-mm is not out yet.
Patching 2.6.10 with 2.6.10-rc3-mm failed (many rejects).
Will the sparse tree work for 2.6.10-rc3?

> > 2.  If I use kernel 2.4.27 (xen-U), top doesn't show correct cpu usage 
> > percentage (idle %, nice %, and so on).
> > It shows either 0% usage on all, or 33% usage each for irq,  softirq, 
> > and iowait.
> > Is there a way to fix this? Kernel 2.6.9 shows correct cpu usage.
> >    
> I tried this (top in Linux 2.4.28) just now and top works except that
> nothing ever is accounted as system time, this needs to be fixed.  But
> I definitely don't see the only-0%/33% usages like you're reporting.
>
>  
I use 2.4.27, since 2.4.28-sparse was not in the sparse-tree back then.
I'll try the 2.4.28 on the new xen-2.0 testing.

Regards,

Fajar


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel