[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: x86_64 progress?

To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Nuutti Kotivuori <naked@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 16:05:44 +0200
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:06:46 +0000
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>

Keir Fraser wrote:
> By Xen64 I mean Xen on x86/64. Full virtualisation will indeed
> require technology such as Intel VT or AMD Pacifica.

Okay, thanks for clearing this up!

-- Naked


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: x86_64 progress?
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: x86_64 progress?
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] About block device mapping for guests
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: x86_64 progress?
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] failed startup caused by unpriveledged domain device nodes not present in priviledged domain
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.