[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] NetBSD port and a couple of remarks
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 03:48:24PM -0800, Kip Macy wrote: > => whoever owns BitKeeper at some point won't sue you, > > In light of recent events that is a genuinely compelling point. Given that we have shown our committment to the open source community by turning down overtures from Red Hat, VA Linux, Borland, and multiple VC's, it's not a compelling point at all. If I was motivated strictly by money I would have either kept my 3% of Cobalt or kept my position as emp #4 at Google, either of which would have made me far more money than BK will. Money isn't the reason we'd sell out, we would have done that by now, we've had multiple offers, any one of which would have made me enough money that I would never have had to ever deal with another mail message like this one. On the other hand, I'm less than thrilled with being, as Kip pointed out, pointlessly flamed for doing something that has been of tremendous help no matter how you look at it. I'd appreciate it if the people who were happy using BK kept on using it and if the rest of the people were polite enough to air their opinions anywhere but my mailbox. I've done my part and gotten off of all public lists so I don't bother anyone with my opinions, it would be oh-so-pleasant if my good friends in Germany were to return the favor. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |