Re: [Xen-cim] Memory pool question

[Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Reposting since it appears my original post didn't make it to the list ...

Subrahmanian, Raj wrote:
> Jim,
>   
> > It's not clear to me which memory object we should be using 
> > to 'populate' a memory pool.  The System Memory Profile 
> > states that 1 instance of CIM_Memory is used to describe the 
> > logical aspects of system memory and * instances of 
> > CIM_PhysicalMemory are used to describe physical aspects of 
> > system memory.  The two are connected via CIM_Realizes association.
> > Which of these should we use to represent the host side of 
> > memory resources assigned to the pool?  Perhaps more clearly 
> > stated as which object should we use on the 'PartComponent' 
> > property of association Xen_MemoryPoolComponent 
> > (CIM_ConcreteComponent)?
> >     
> Xen does not allow us to look at the details of the physical memory and
> so, I have started working on the assumption that it's going to be
> CIM_Memory.
>
> Raj
>   
Are you working on Xen_Memory, Xen_MemoryPool and all of the related 
associations? I'm about done with it :-/. Pretty much a repeat of the 
Processor stuff I finished a while back. In fact, many of the 
associations have common code that needs to be abstracted out. It would 
have significant impact on lines of code :-).
In addition I have another version of the memory stuff (and all other 
providers that touch Xen) for the new C bindings.
Jim


_______________________________________________
Xen-cim mailing list
Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim