[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-cim] Re: Various implementation questions


  • To: "Gareth S Bestor" <bestorga@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Subrahmanian, Raj" <raj.subrahmanian@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:10:30 -0400
  • Cc: xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:10:43 -0700
  • List-id: xen-cim mailing list <xen-cim.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Acap5mg0wAGKExf4Sy2qTfbQ1uNxVwABnpMQ
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-cim] Re: Various implementation questions

Gareth,
I had re-enabled the code in XenHostedComputerSystem.c and it has
already been tested (as part of the combined patch). 
I don't mind re-commenting it to ensure that bad things don't happen in
OpenPegausus for now.
Raj

______________________________
From: Gareth S Bestor [mailto:bestorga@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 5:17 PM
To: Subrahmanian, Raj
Cc: xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Xen-cim] Re: Various implementation questions

depends... :-)

I already have a workaround (in our IBM internal provider version) for
Pegasus to make Associators work, but if the original commented-out code
works fine for OpenWBEM (and sfcb?) then I'm tempted not to put in the
patch until we get a better idea of if/when this will be fixed in
OpenPegasus. How about give your patch a go - ie re-enable the
commented-out code - and if it works fine, maybe I'll add my Pegasus
workaround later via a conditional compile. Like I said, the commented
code ***should*** work but it was causing Pegasus to die horribly, so I
commented it out (and didnt come up with a woekaround till after we'd
Open Sourced our IBM internal providers).

- Gareth 

Inactive hide details for "Subrahmanian, Raj"
<raj.subrahmanian@xxxxxxxxxx>"Subrahmanian, Raj"
<raj.subrahmanian@xxxxxxxxxx>




                                "Subrahmanian, Raj"
<raj.subrahmanian@xxxxxxxxxx> 
                                Sent by:
xen-cim-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

                                07/17/06 01:48 PM

        

To
        
Gareth S Bestor/Beaverton/IBM@IBMUS     


cc
        
xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx     


Subject
        
RE: [Xen-cim] Re: Various implementation questions      
                

Gareth
I was going through the association providers to clean them up.
I noticed that in the Associators function does not do a
CMReturnInstance call. I remember you said that it was an issue with the
Pegausus CIMOM.
Has this been fixed?
In other words, can I just uncomment the lines, or shall I put in a
conditional compile?
I have attached the code snippet.
Thanks
Raj

<From XenHostedMemory.c, function Associators() Line 245>
// BUG - returning data causes crash !?!
_SBLIM_TRACE(2, ("--- data.value.inst=\"%s\"",
CMGetCharPtr(CDToString(_BROKER, data.value.inst, NULL))));
//         if (strcmp(sourcename, resultname) == 0)
CMReturnInstance(results, data.value.inst);
     }

_______________________________________________
Xen-cim mailing list
Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim




_______________________________________________
Xen-cim mailing list
Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.