|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [xen staging] x86/ucode: Rename hypercall-context functions
commit 8e9d1173c3237f8ef2800dadb99af5f57d762bb6
Author: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Fri Aug 23 19:38:59 2024 +0100
Commit: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Wed Feb 26 11:58:55 2025 +0000
x86/ucode: Rename hypercall-context functions
microcode_update{,_helper}() are overly generic names in a file that has
multiple update routines and helper functions contexts.
Rename microcode_update() to ucode_update_hcall() so it explicitly
identifies
itself as hypercall context, and rename microcode_update_helper() to
ucode_update_hcall_cont() to make it clear it is in continuation context.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@xxxxxxx>
---
xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c | 10 +++++-----
xen/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 4 ++--
xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
index de00c22b4b..9fe86942a3 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ struct ucode_buf {
char buffer[];
};
-static long cf_check microcode_update_helper(void *data)
+static long cf_check ucode_update_hcall_cont(void *data)
{
struct microcode_patch *patch = NULL;
int ret, result;
@@ -611,8 +611,8 @@ static long cf_check microcode_update_helper(void *data)
return ret;
}
-int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(const_void) buf,
- unsigned long len, unsigned int flags)
+int ucode_update_hcall(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(const_void) buf,
+ unsigned long len, unsigned int flags)
{
int ret;
struct ucode_buf *buffer;
@@ -637,11 +637,11 @@ int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(const_void) buf,
buffer->flags = flags;
/*
- * Always queue microcode_update_helper() on CPU0. Most of the logic
+ * Always queue ucode_update_hcall_cont() on CPU0. Most of the logic
* won't care, but the update of the Raw CPU policy wants to (re)run on
* the BSP.
*/
- return continue_hypercall_on_cpu(0, microcode_update_helper, buffer);
+ return continue_hypercall_on_cpu(0, ucode_update_hcall_cont, buffer);
}
/* Load a cached update to current cpu */
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h
b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h
index c62c131fd0..7f7ebb3d2a 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ struct cpu_signature {
DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_signature, cpu_sig);
void microcode_set_module(unsigned int idx);
-int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(const_void) buf,
- unsigned long len, unsigned int flags);
+int ucode_update_hcall(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(const_void) buf,
+ unsigned long len, unsigned int flags);
int microcode_update_one(void);
struct boot_info;
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c
b/xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c
index 67f851237d..90abd3197f 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
guest_from_compat_handle(data, op->u.microcode.data);
- ret = microcode_update(data, op->u.microcode.length, 0);
+ ret = ucode_update_hcall(data, op->u.microcode.length, 0);
break;
}
@@ -323,8 +323,8 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
guest_from_compat_handle(data, op->u.microcode2.data);
- ret = microcode_update(data, op->u.microcode2.length,
- op->u.microcode2.flags);
+ ret = ucode_update_hcall(data, op->u.microcode2.length,
+ op->u.microcode2.flags);
break;
}
--
generated by git-patchbot for /home/xen/git/xen.git#staging
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |