[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-bugs] [Bug 1011] Xen Not Working after installing on Fedora 5 with Kernel (Xen0)
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1011 henning_sprang@xxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Comment #5 from henning_sprang@xxxxxx 2007-07-03 01:37 ------- > Installed Fedora 5 no gui > > Kernel 2.6.15-1/2054_FC5 and installed Xen 3.0.3_6.fc5 from yum install > command. Please report bugs in Xen versions delivered by distribution vendors to these vendors first. They male significant changes (and deliver Linux Kernels that are not produced by XenSource upstream), and they should check first, if these problems come fromt these. Their development teams will forward problems that are repoducable on upstream Xen current versions. So the rest of this mail is more or less to help you write better bug reports, which yoiu should send to the Fedora developers. You should, still, try everything on an up to date version of Fedora and Xen before posting a bug report to them, and try to ask the user lists for help. > > typed xend start; nothing > > typed xm list; nothing > "nothing" seems not to be a clear description of what is happening. You will either get an error message on the console (at least, that the command does not exist), or in the xen logfiles. "nothing" is very unlikely. Still, it is normal that a reboot is needed after Xen packages are installed, because the hypervisor needs to be loaded first. > rebooted server > > received posted error Where do you read the error message exactly? What else can be read in the Xen log files? What processor is built into the system you are using (that seems to be imprtant when debugging such a hardware-related feature)? Please be aware, that tracking and fixing bugs in software is a very exact science - without getting evenly exact error descriptions, developers cannot make software better. Sorry if my tone here is very direct, but the bug tracking system is only useful when developers use it to coordinate their optimization work, and they can only use it if bug reports from users are exact and help reproducing and tracking down problems. This requires some care with entering bugs into the system, and some rules to be followed. Even then, ypu should add more info to the bug #1004 (which I just found when researching for your problem) instead of keeping this one open. #1004 is already about missing powernow support, and, if not the newest, at least a newer version. I also found the mailing list posts you mentioned and will add this info to the bug #1004. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 1004 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. _______________________________________________ Xen-bugs mailing list Xen-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-bugs
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |