[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-bugs] [Bug 564] New: xm list possibly has same problem as xm vcpu-list had...
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=564 Summary: xm list possibly has same problem as xm vcpu-list had... Product: Xen Version: 3.0-testing Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: Tools AssignedTo: xen-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: Shaun.Reitan@xxxxxxxxxxx I recently submited bug id#545 that was resolved in unstable. This is great seeing how now `xm vcpu-list` only takes about 1 second to run on a host with 40 guests. The problem i now see is that `xm list` on the same setup takes 3-5 seconds to run and from the looks of it, it's displaying pretty much the same stuff that `xm vcpu-list` is showing... vcpu-list shows the following catagorys name,ID,VCPU,CPU,State,Time(s),CPU Affinity while list shows the following catagorys Name,ID,Mem(MiB),VCPUs,State,Time(s) Obviously list will show much more information when --long is passed to it but if you look at the catagorys of both they are for the most part showing the same info (other than mem and vcpu). Should it be taking 3-5 seconds to run on a idle host?! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. _______________________________________________ Xen-bugs mailing list Xen-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-bugs
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |