Re: [XenARM] Moribund or just plain dead

[Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@xxxxxxxxx>]

Nate,

we should archive this list. All xen arm related discussion is now happening on xen-devel (as ARM support is in mainline) and the xen arm list is really just confusing. I will also have to clean up the portal pages on xenproject.org. 

I suppose we could make the argument that the Xen ARM PV port is completed on the grounds that support is now in Xen 4.3 (and newer). At the Xen Project developer summit 2 weeks ago, even Samsung said that they plan to move to mainline Xen on ARM. 

With more and more companies being interested in Xen on ARM, the old list is plain confusing. I think it is necessary though to go through the steps listed in the process to properly archive the project, but I think we can archive the xen-arm list (i.e. remove it from the index, maybe close it to new posts) and de-emphasize Xen ARM PV on the xenproject.org pages

Thoughts?

Regards

Lars

On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Nate Studer <nate.studer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Ian,

In each of these threads, you give a pretty bleak diagnosis of xen-arm.  Since
the last post from the authors was a couple years ago and it seems that the only
posts on this list anymore are accidental ones, at what point is xen-arm just dead?


http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-arm/2013-10/msg00013.html

http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-arm/2013-09/msg00007.html

http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-arm/2013-03/msg00006.html


--
Nathan Studer
DornerWorks, Ltd.
Embedded Systems Engineering

_______________________________________________
Xen-arm mailing list
Xen-arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-arm

_______________________________________________
Xen-arm mailing list
Xen-arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-arm